- Posts: 1808
- Thank you received: 249
Phoenix Fighter
- kaw-a-holic
- Topic Author
- Offline
- User
I have an idea for fork extentions that would work but you would not be able to abuse the forks with them on. I don't think this is a serious issue since once they are adjusted they usually stay where they are. Secondly, the triple tree route goes two ways. If you do a drop but keep the same offset as the zx9 you only have to do an upper. If you want to change the offset then you have to make both upper and lower.davido wrote: 4inches is about 10cm. Thats about what I have with the ZX9R forks and thats with the bike standing at rest.No paddock stand and no rider.
That is not a lot and (for me) not enough.
I was talking with my local bike shop owner about this today. Fork extensions or dropped triple tree? Im still undecided.With fork extensions,you have a weak spot,with dropped upper yoke you have a weak area,unless you drop the bottom yoke as well,in which case you have an empty bank account!For the money,he reckoned the extensions would be good enough.
I was also thinking about heavier springs in the forks but he thought that wouldnt work because the springs are rated to the weight of the bike. I pointed out that the ZXR springs (in your case GSXR springs) would be rated to the weight of a ZXR (GSXR) which would be a lot lighter than a 1980s KZ so,it should be possible to fit heavier springs without losing effectiveness in the front suspension (probably improving it). Heavier springs would,in theory, lift the front end,though I dont know by how much.Then again,every little bit helps!
Im just running this around in my mind at the minute as I have a ton of other things to sort out first but I need to sit down and figure this all out. First thing is to set up the sag properly ,as the bike is.Take some proper measurements and go from there.
Jon
1977 KZ1000a1
Mesa, AZ
Phoenix Fighter Project
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- SWest
- Offline
- Sustaining Member
- 10 22 2014
- Posts: 23028
- Thank you received: 2758
Steve
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- kaw-a-holic
- Topic Author
- Offline
- User
- Posts: 1808
- Thank you received: 249
swest wrote: Wouldn't changing the spacing by lowering the upper one weaken the whole steering head assy?
Steve
It would not be as strong as a flat one. The amount of force that it would take to shear a dropped version, I don;t think the triple tree is going to be the only issue.
Jon
1977 KZ1000a1
Mesa, AZ
Phoenix Fighter Project
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- davido
- Offline
- User
- Posts: 1582
- Thank you received: 291
With the extensions,(the way I understand it) Its not about them moving in the clamps,so long as the diameter is good and the strength should be fine.Most of the force will be going downwards.The problem would be when braking.The force goes more forward as the forks want to bend. You would have a joint held together with a couple of cms of fine thread. I dont see anything snapping right away but over time , things might weaken up.
With the dropped top tree,I think its a lot more secure,theres no joint,so your forks would be able to deal with the stresses the way they were designed to but as Steve says, the distance twixt upper and lower yoke would be smaller and although this shouldnt effect the strength,it might have an effect on handeling (speed wobbles etc)
Im not an engineer,so Im not pretending that I understand all of this.I could be completly wrong (It wouldnt be the first time)!
On the bright side,This is pretty much a bolt on choice.If the extensions dont work,its easy enough to switch to the dropped triple (if youve got the cash. )
www.kzrider.com/forum/11-projects/594313-csr1000-project-build
CB550 (1978)
CB500/4 (1972)*
KZ1000CSR (1981)
XT 600E (1999)
TDM900 (2003)
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- SWest
- Offline
- Sustaining Member
- 10 22 2014
- Posts: 23028
- Thank you received: 2758
Steve
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- spdygon
- Offline
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 1013
- Thank you received: 117
Check and yes they are 1 . 5 " longer then the 750. And no I don't have and extra set. Infact I have a extra set of 750 that I was going to change one of the inner tubes.
Now I need to check if the inner chrome tube are the same or not.
On the 1100 the outer tube is what is longer. From dust seal to center of shaft it the same length .
1982 GS1000sz Katana ( #15...17K Miles)
1982 GS1000sz Katana ( # 297....7100k Miles)
1978 Kz1000 Z1R. 10K Miles1
1978 kz1000 z1r 27k miles
1977 KZ 1000 A ( Project ) 54K Miles
1976 Kz900A4 (Red)21K miles
1976 Kz900A4 ( Red)7500 miles
1974 Z1 900 project
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- kaw-a-holic
- Topic Author
- Offline
- User
- Posts: 1808
- Thank you received: 249
spdygon wrote: Kaw A holic..
Check and yes they are 1 . 5 " longer then the 750. And no I don't have and extra set. Infact I have a extra set of 750 that I was going to change one of the inner tubes.
Now I need to check if the inner chrome tube are the same or not.
On the 1100 the outer tube is what is longer. From dust seal to center of shaft it the same length .
Spygon
Thank you, I am looking at a set on eBay. I want to get these fork legs and see if I still need a drop or maybe just less.
Jon
1977 KZ1000a1
Mesa, AZ
Phoenix Fighter Project
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- kaw-a-holic
- Topic Author
- Offline
- User
- Posts: 1808
- Thank you received: 249
Jon
1977 KZ1000a1
Mesa, AZ
Phoenix Fighter Project
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- 9er rider
- Offline
- Sustaining Member
- Keep a cool tool
- Posts: 578
- Thank you received: 87
76 kz 900 1075 76 kz 900 a4 78 kz 1000 ltd
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- kaw-a-holic
- Topic Author
- Offline
- User
- Posts: 1808
- Thank you received: 249
Jon
1977 KZ1000a1
Mesa, AZ
Phoenix Fighter Project
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- kaw-a-holic
- Topic Author
- Offline
- User
- Posts: 1808
- Thank you received: 249
Jon
1977 KZ1000a1
Mesa, AZ
Phoenix Fighter Project
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- SWest
- Offline
- Sustaining Member
- 10 22 2014
- Posts: 23028
- Thank you received: 2758
Steve
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.