- Posts: 5359
- Thank you received: 109
'76 KZ900 (ZRX1200R) Build
- mark1122
- Offline
- User
- Keep twisting it
with a non stock setup, it will be impossible to get accurate spring weight info.
i have installed raceteck fork shims and springs, but all of there data is based on the stock geometry of each bike.
u will need to get an opinion from a good tech.
76 KZ, frame gusset work,1200CC.Ported by Larry Cavanaugh, 1.5mm.over intakes, Carron Pipe, ZRX12 rear end, and seat,96zx9 front end.
01 CBR600F4i Track bike.
Cobourg, Ont. Can.
~ ~ ~_@
~ ~ _- \,
~ (k) / (z)
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- NakedFun
- Topic Author
- Offline
- User
- Posts: 1095
- Thank you received: 99
mark1122 wrote: u could just try it and see how it works, thats what i did. but in the end it made more sense to copy what ma kawi's engineers had already figured out.
with a non stock setup, it will be impossible to get accurate spring weight info.
i have installed raceteck fork shims and springs, but all of there data is based on the stock geometry of each bike.
u will need to get an opinion from a good tech.
True, but if you talk with the ZRXOA (I see you're a member there too) they think the stock ZRX suspension/geometry is not sprung for the majority of the riders.....evidently the US public is really fat compared to Japan! lol I am thinking more and more of taking my new upper mounts to the mill, radius them and and weld them into the frame tubes about 2 inches or so down from the junction with the seat rails. I think it is close to where you ended up. Will take the measurements tonight and compare to my ZRX.
Cory
2008 Kawasaki Concours 14
1999 Kawasaki ZRX1100
1976 Kawasaki KZ900
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- mark1122
- Offline
- User
- Keep twisting it
- Posts: 5359
- Thank you received: 109
i just feel that my rear end (the bikes, lol)feels better/smoother, tracks the road better in the lowered position. it also makes the internal damping work as intended. its more about letting the shock work the modern way as apposed to the old way. when they designed the kz that era ran the shocks more upright. a vertical shock over the axle travels at the same rate as the wheel. 1:1. through there racing efforts they discovered that the bikes handled better when they started giving the shock less travel to the axles. Just look at the race bikes in the late 70’s to early 80’s, they started laying the shock down. this improved the handling. eventually they hit the limit, and went mono with levers to get the ratios way up. and the handling went up with it.
it made a big dif. that I could feel. to me anyways
hard to go wrong if u copy ma kawi.
76 KZ, frame gusset work,1200CC.Ported by Larry Cavanaugh, 1.5mm.over intakes, Carron Pipe, ZRX12 rear end, and seat,96zx9 front end.
01 CBR600F4i Track bike.
Cobourg, Ont. Can.
~ ~ ~_@
~ ~ _- \,
~ (k) / (z)
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- 750steve
- Offline
- User
07 ZX6R Race Bike
1977 Z750 B2 Twin
1976 Z650 B1
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- NakedFun
- Topic Author
- Offline
- User
- Posts: 1095
- Thank you received: 99
bluezbike wrote: Hi Cory,
My question about the length of the forks is because I will be building a bike up this winter and I am gathering as much information as I can before I start as I have never done this before.
I followed a discussion earlier in another thread about how important it was to know exactly what one is doing when changing out front ends which in turn can alter the way bike handles, sometimes very badly, not a situation I want to find myself in. Length of forks was a biggie as well as offsets, trail etc. Many thanks for all the replies.
Alec aka Bluezbike
Alec,
30.25" from axle center to flat surface on fork cap.
Cory
2008 Kawasaki Concours 14
1999 Kawasaki ZRX1100
1976 Kawasaki KZ900
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- NakedFun
- Topic Author
- Offline
- User
- Posts: 1095
- Thank you received: 99
Cory
2008 Kawasaki Concours 14
1999 Kawasaki ZRX1100
1976 Kawasaki KZ900
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- mark1122
- Offline
- User
- Keep twisting it
- Posts: 5359
- Thank you received: 109
what if u were to run a 1/2" or 5/8" off set countersprocket. would that help fix it at the back?
Leon , D&G or PMF can make any offset u need.
76 KZ, frame gusset work,1200CC.Ported by Larry Cavanaugh, 1.5mm.over intakes, Carron Pipe, ZRX12 rear end, and seat,96zx9 front end.
01 CBR600F4i Track bike.
Cobourg, Ont. Can.
~ ~ ~_@
~ ~ _- \,
~ (k) / (z)
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- mtbspeedfreak
- Offline
- User
- Posts: 1413
- Thank you received: 36
750steve wrote: Need some idea's?
racingcafe.blogspot.co.uk/2012/07/kawasa...900-style-by-rf.html
Oh wow... I thought that was a Z1 at first!!! Mad kudos to whoever made that!
I'm curious to see how you like the front end and how much lower the bike is. I'm strongly considering rebuilding my stock front end with RaceTech goodies, but I'd love to swap it out for a ZRX front end.
2000 ZRX 1100
1976 KZ 900- Daily Driver
1980 LTD 550- Dalton Highway survivor!
If it has tits or tires, it'll give you problems!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- camaroguy
- Offline
- User
- Posts: 351
- Thank you received: 5
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- NakedFun
- Topic Author
- Offline
- User
- Posts: 1095
- Thank you received: 99
I have been reading technical articles from sprocket/chain manufacters that discuss chain alignment. Naturally, if a chain is out of alignment, that is not good. You get accelerated wear, uneven wear, possible chain derailment, etc... Now they did a study and found that at 3 degrees defelection robbed approx. 4.25 HP when measured on a dyno. So I took some measurements of the current setup as it is, without an correction for alignment besides the front offset sprocket.
The plane to plane difference is 12mm (.47") in order to put it into perfect alingment. Now like I stated above, it appears with the "o" ring chain stacked plate thickness, I will be at an additional 8 mm toward the tire. Currently I have about 19 mm of clearance, so I have a conflict of 2 mm (1mm for the difference, and another for min clearance). So with a cetner to center distance of 27.25" and a displacement of .47" it looks like I am just shy of 1 degree (.99) of deflection. Is there an acceptable angle of deflection? Less than 0.5 degrees? Just thinking if I mill the hub as far as I can without running the chain into the tire and letting the rest of it be? What about adding the difference into the shim and placing it behind the front sprocket? Thoughts?
Cory
2008 Kawasaki Concours 14
1999 Kawasaki ZRX1100
1976 Kawasaki KZ900
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- NakedFun
- Topic Author
- Offline
- User
- Posts: 1095
- Thank you received: 99
I know I can get 5/8" pretty easily and was thinking of ordering one through PBSprockets where I got this one. Very nice part and inexpensive. My fear is two fold:
1. Frame clearance: It seems like everyone who runs the 5/8" offset has to clearance the frame.
2. Outer Bearing Support Required: I really don't want to have to run an outer bearing support.
If I have leon make me a 1/2" offset which would atleast get me out of the tire rub issue, I would still have to check on the frame clearance though. Would I need an outer bearing support for that as well? Thoughts comments concerns?
Cory
2008 Kawasaki Concours 14
1999 Kawasaki ZRX1100
1976 Kawasaki KZ900
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- NakedFun
- Topic Author
- Offline
- User
- Posts: 1095
- Thank you received: 99
In addition, need to decide on two different sets of front calipers.
6 pots:
4 pots:
Comments? Thoughts?
Cory
2008 Kawasaki Concours 14
1999 Kawasaki ZRX1100
1976 Kawasaki KZ900
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.