- Posts: 7246
- Thank you received: 337
Startup After Top-End Rebuild.
- bountyhunter
- Offline
- User
That is what came from the factory printed on the tach of each new kawi. It was clear sticker that said 4000 RPM max for first 500 miles, 6000 RPM max for 500 - 1000 miles. There was also supposed to be a service (valve clearance check and head torque with oil change) at 500 miles. Those stickers came on every new bike sold when I bought mine in '79.zukdave wrote: So a race motor gets ran about 5 minutes on a dyno
then they do FULL POWER pull's to redline
but a rering on a 30 year old motor needs 500+ mile's ?
1979 KZ-750 Twin
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- bountyhunter
- Offline
- User
- Posts: 7246
- Thank you received: 337
Just torque them same as when you installed it initially.daveo wrote:
koolaid_kid wrote: LOL. I agree with multiple checking on torque. I prefer to rev to redline, but not under a huge load. It allows the rings to seat properly without glazing. Some prefer to rev the blazes out of it, maximum power, but I cannot agree. Nor can I agree with the gentle break in, just does not make sense. So I compromise.
I was advised to put a light film of oil on the threads and bottom of the head-nuts before installing them.
Is the correct (re-torque) method to break loose each nut before re-tightening? If so, would that be just after initial heat/cool cycle, or anytime thereafter as well?
1979 KZ-750 Twin
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- 650ed
- Offline
- User
- Posts: 15344
- Thank you received: 2829
bountyhunter wrote: ...... It was clear sticker that said 4000 RPM max for first 500 miles, 6000 RPM max for 500 - 1000 miles. There was also supposed to be a service (valve clearance check and head torque with oil change) at 500 miles. Those stickers came on every new bike sold when I bought mine in '79.
I agree. Since every Kawasaki came from the factory with similar break-in instructions why wouldn't the same procedure be followed for new rings and cylinder honing (with or without new pistons and bored cylinders)? Maybe there's something I don't understand (so please educate me), but I would think new rings and honed cylinders would need the same break-in whether they came from the factory or from a 30+ year later rebuild.
Maybe break-in would be different for a pure race motor that isn't expected to go 80-100k miles before a rebuild and which cannot be ridden hundreds of miles off the track before being raced, but for a street bike engine I would expect the break-in procedure to be the same as when the bike was new. Ed
1977 KZ650-C1 Original Owner - Stock (with additional invisible FIAMM horn)
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- zukdave
- Offline
- User
- Posts: 1685
- Thank you received: 229
bountyhunter wrote: Those stickers came on every new bike sold when I bought mine in '79.
That same sticker was on the speedo on the 1973 GT80 I got
brand new but we're not talking brand new motorcycle's
It's a 30+ year old motor that has heat cycle'd more times then you
can count so what's to break in on a rering but seating the ring's
1980 KZ650 F1
ZX750A1 motor.
Wiseco 810cc kit.
Zukiworks racing ported head.
VM 29 smooth bore's.
Dyna 2000 Ign. w/Dyna mini coil's
APE cylinder stud's and nut's.
APE valve spring's.
APE Track King clutch.
V/H KZ1000 sidewinder.
3.5x18 laced to a KZ1000 disk hub.
150/60/18 Shinko 006 Podium.
63" wheel base.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- 650ed
- Offline
- User
- Posts: 15344
- Thank you received: 2829
zukdave wrote:
bountyhunter wrote: Those stickers came on every new bike sold when I bought mine in '79.
That same sticker was on the speedo on the 1973 GT80 I got
brand new but we're not talking brand new motorcycle's
It's a 30+ year old motor that has heat cycle'd more times then you
can count so what's to break in on a rering but seating the ring's
That helps explain it to me. So is the long 500/1000 mile new bike break-in period intended to let things like cam bearing surfaces, rod plain bearings, etc. break in gently, but the rings/cylinder walls don't require such a lengthy procedure once the rings are seated? Ed
1977 KZ650-C1 Original Owner - Stock (with additional invisible FIAMM horn)
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- koolaid_kid
- Offline
- User
- Posts: 783
- Thank you received: 99
1983 GPz 750
810 Wiseco, Kerker, K&N, DynoJet S3, Accel, Progressive, etc.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- ezrider714
- Offline
- User
- Posts: 256
- Thank you received: 38
The requirements are quite different on a race motor that will be torn down much more frequently than a street motor that you are trying to get as many miles on before having to do a teardown and re-ring, looking for the last tenth of ET on a dragstrip, Your mileage my vary
78 KZ650SR Mine since 79
4-1 Mac Jet Hot coated since mid 80's
Dyna Coils
Saddlebags (I ain't skeered of going nowhere)
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- bountyhunter
- Offline
- User
- Posts: 7246
- Thank you received: 337
1979 KZ-750 Twin
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Nessism
- Offline
- Sustaining Member
- Posts: 7507
- Thank you received: 2824
www.lasleeve.com/downloads/4-stroke-break-in-procedures.pdf
Bottom line:
They recommend running the bike in the garage at 2000 rpm for 15 mins with fans blowing on the engine. Let it cool then do it again, this time varying the rpm from 1500-3500 rpm. Jetting should be a little rich, definitely not lean.
First real ride (10-15 mins) is not to exceed 1/2 throttle and 1/2 max rpm's. Accelerate and decelerate constantly.
2nd ride recommends up to 3/4 throttle and 3/4 rpms.
3rd ride etc, until the first tank of fuel is gone, and you can go full throttle but keep rpm's down to 3/4 scale.
2nd tank of fuel and they talk about doing jetting checks and such using full throttle and reving the engine out. Basically, the engine is fully ready to run after the first tank.
Sort of flys in the face of all those super conservative suggestions by the various motorcycle manufacturers. I'm pretty much convinced that these recommendations are designed to give the new rider a chance to get used to the new bike. Wonder how many guys would get killed if Kawasaki told KZ1000 owners to use 3/4 throttle and 3/4 rpm after the second real ride and full throttle on the 3rd?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- missionkz
- Offline
- Sustaining Member
I don't know if any of that makes any difference but I do agree with your other assertion that the 0-500, 500 to 1000 miles, factory break in... is also based on breaking in yourself on a new machine.
Bruce
1977 KZ1000A1
2016 Triumph T120 Bonneville
Far North East Metro Denver Colorado
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Nessism
- Offline
- Sustaining Member
- Posts: 7507
- Thank you received: 2824
missionkz wrote: The only thing that bugs me about that article is that most of it is written with respect to off road bikes, trikes, quads and snowmobiles.
I don't know if any of that makes any difference but I do agree with your other assertion that the 0-500, 500 to 1000 miles, factory break in... is also based on breaking in yourself on a new machine.
I put my money on a far more aggressive break-in. That's what the aircraft engine guys do and they don't mess around.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- kawi810
- Offline
- User
- Posts: 230
- Thank you received: 11
original owner of a 1984 gpz 750
1985 turbo 750 stock, being restored.
1984 gpz 750 with 810 cc wiesco's megacycle cams(471-10) 34 mm flatslides v&h pipe ported head dyna ignition. bottom end, crank case from turbo 750 and sprockets.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.