kz440 timing advance unit problem
- gabeb123
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- User
-
Registered
- Posts: 22
- Thanks: 0
Re: kz440 timing advance unit problem
27 Feb 2011 16:24
its a twin so there are only 2 spark plugs and there is only one pickup module.... so doesn't the spark plugs spark twice as much as they need to anyways?
thanks
thanks
1982 kz440 A3-D4
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Patton
-
- Offline
- KZr Legend
-
Registered
- Posts: 18568
- Thanks: 2101
Re: kz440 timing advance unit problem
27 Feb 2011 16:51
gabeb123 wrote:
Yes, the spark plugs do indeed spark twice as much as they need to.
When the rotor points to the module, the ignition coil's primary winding becomes ungrounded, which causes both spark plugs to simultaneously fire.
The F mark on the advancer is supposed to align with the permanent case mark slightly before the pistons simultaneously reach top dead center.
The spark that ignites the mixture within the combustion chamber that's on its compression stroke is actually doing something.
The other spark within the combustion chamber that's on its exhaust stroke is "wasted."
Good Fortune!
its a twin so there are only 2 spark plugs and there is only one pickup module.... so doesn't the spark plugs spark twice as much as they need to anyways?
thanks
Yes, the spark plugs do indeed spark twice as much as they need to.
When the rotor points to the module, the ignition coil's primary winding becomes ungrounded, which causes both spark plugs to simultaneously fire.
The F mark on the advancer is supposed to align with the permanent case mark slightly before the pistons simultaneously reach top dead center.
The spark that ignites the mixture within the combustion chamber that's on its compression stroke is actually doing something.
The other spark within the combustion chamber that's on its exhaust stroke is "wasted."
Good Fortune!

1973 Z1
KZ900 LTD
KZ900 LTD
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- gabeb123
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- User
-
Registered
- Posts: 22
- Thanks: 0
Re: kz440 timing advance unit problem
27 Feb 2011 19:13
so pretty much it doesn't matter what way the rotor faces(because it can only face 2 ways) right?
1982 kz440 A3-D4
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- loudhvx
-
- Offline
- KZr Legend
-
Registered
- Posts: 10864
- Thanks: 1619
Re: kz440 timing advance unit problem
27 Feb 2011 19:37 - 27 Feb 2011 19:43
gabeb123 wrote:
Not quite. One way the spark happens when both cylinders are at the top, as they should be. If the rotor were to be 180 degrees out, then the spark would always happen when the pistons are at the bottom. That's no good.
Maybe it's the fact that both pistons go up and down together that is throwing you off. That type of motor is known as a 360 degree motor.
Honda CB twins are what is known as 180 degree twins. There, one piston is up while the other is down. This is why that type of twin has a really rough feeling motor. The ignition firing is very uneven. The KZ twins (400,440,750) are much smoother (when properly tuned).
so pretty much it doesn't matter what way the rotor faces(because it can only face 2 ways) right?
Not quite. One way the spark happens when both cylinders are at the top, as they should be. If the rotor were to be 180 degrees out, then the spark would always happen when the pistons are at the bottom. That's no good.
Maybe it's the fact that both pistons go up and down together that is throwing you off. That type of motor is known as a 360 degree motor.
Honda CB twins are what is known as 180 degree twins. There, one piston is up while the other is down. This is why that type of twin has a really rough feeling motor. The ignition firing is very uneven. The KZ twins (400,440,750) are much smoother (when properly tuned).
1981 KZ550 D1 gpz.
Kz550 valve train warning.
Other links.
Kz550 valve train warning.
Other links.
Last edit: 27 Feb 2011 19:43 by loudhvx.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- MFolks
-
- Offline
- User
-
Registered
- Posts: 6650
- Thanks: 541
Re: kz440 timing advance unit problem
27 Feb 2011 19:46
This shows you how old I am, but I remember some early Honda's having a 360 crank in I believe, the Benly and Dream motorcycles of the late 1960's.
1982 GPZ1100 B2
General Dynamics/Convair 1983-1993
GLCM BGM-109 Tomahawk, AGM-129A Advanced Cruise Missile (ACM)
General Dynamics/Convair 1983-1993
GLCM BGM-109 Tomahawk, AGM-129A Advanced Cruise Missile (ACM)
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- gabeb123
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- User
-
Registered
- Posts: 22
- Thanks: 0
Re: kz440 timing advance unit problem
27 Feb 2011 20:37
wait so the piston's dont alternate in a kz440?
1982 kz440 A3-D4
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- loudhvx
-
- Offline
- KZr Legend
-
Registered
- Posts: 10864
- Thanks: 1619
Re: kz440 timing advance unit problem
27 Feb 2011 20:44 - 27 Feb 2011 20:46
gabeb123 wrote:
Yes, that's why a KZ440/400 doesn't sound like a misfiring engine, like a CB 350... uh, unless it's actually misfiring.
Here's what the crank looks like.
wait so the piston's dont alternate in a kz440?
Yes, that's why a KZ440/400 doesn't sound like a misfiring engine, like a CB 350... uh, unless it's actually misfiring.

Here's what the crank looks like.
1981 KZ550 D1 gpz.
Kz550 valve train warning.
Other links.
Kz550 valve train warning.
Other links.
Attachments:
Last edit: 27 Feb 2011 20:46 by loudhvx.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- gabeb123
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- User
-
Registered
- Posts: 22
- Thanks: 0
Re: kz440 timing advance unit problem
27 Feb 2011 20:51
oh ok i guess ya learn something new everyday huh. hey my battery is shot on it so i took the battery out and ive been using jumper cables and a car battery that should work fine just in my garage shouldnt it?
thanks
thanks
1982 kz440 A3-D4
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- loudhvx
-
- Offline
- KZr Legend
-
Registered
- Posts: 10864
- Thanks: 1619
Re: kz440 timing advance unit problem
28 Feb 2011 11:10
Yes that should work as long as you don't crank it too long or too often. A car battery can crank much longer than a bike battery, so there is the potential of overheating the starter.
1981 KZ550 D1 gpz.
Kz550 valve train warning.
Other links.
Kz550 valve train warning.
Other links.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Patton
-
- Offline
- KZr Legend
-
Registered
- Posts: 18568
- Thanks: 2101
Re: kz440 timing advance unit problem
28 Feb 2011 11:39
gabeb123 wrote:
For anyone who might be unaware ---
If the car battery being jumped from happens to be installed in another vehicle, be certain that the engine in the other vehicle is NOT running and that its ignition key is switched OFF while jumped to the bike's battery (or to the bike's battery cable lugs).
A car's charging system may quickly overwhelm and fry bike components if the car engine is running while the bike is being jumped from the car battery.
Imo, this admonition is worth emphasizing due to the common practice of leaving the donor car engine running while using its battery to jump start another car.
Never touch any part of the bike with a jumper cable from a battery that's installed in a vehicle with a running engine.
Good Fortune!
...battery is shot on it so i took the battery out and ive been using jumper cables and a car battery that should work fine just in my garage shouldnt it? thanks
For anyone who might be unaware ---
If the car battery being jumped from happens to be installed in another vehicle, be certain that the engine in the other vehicle is NOT running and that its ignition key is switched OFF while jumped to the bike's battery (or to the bike's battery cable lugs).
A car's charging system may quickly overwhelm and fry bike components if the car engine is running while the bike is being jumped from the car battery.
Imo, this admonition is worth emphasizing due to the common practice of leaving the donor car engine running while using its battery to jump start another car.
Never touch any part of the bike with a jumper cable from a battery that's installed in a vehicle with a running engine.
Good Fortune!

1973 Z1
KZ900 LTD
KZ900 LTD
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- gabeb123
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- User
-
Registered
- Posts: 22
- Thanks: 0
Re: kz440 timing advance unit problem
28 Feb 2011 13:29
no its just a car battery its not even in a car ive been just charging it with like a 6 amp charger.
thanks
thanks
1982 kz440 A3-D4
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- stonemaster
-
- User
-
Public
- Thanks: 0
Re: kz440 timing advance unit problem
28 Feb 2011 18:59
Patton wrote:
in a friends shop I saw the results of a bike that had been jumped from a running car, FRY PUPPY :woohoo:
gabeb123 wrote:...battery is shot on it so i took the battery out and ive been using jumper cables and a car battery that should work fine just in my garage shouldnt it? thanks
For anyone who might be unaware ---
If the car battery being jumped from happens to be installed in another vehicle, be certain that the engine in the other vehicle is NOT running and that its ignition key is switched OFF while jumped to the bike's battery (or to the bike's battery cable lugs).
A car's charging system may quickly overwhelm and fry bike components if the car engine is running while the bike is being jumped from the car battery.
Imo, this admonition is worth emphasizing due to the common practice of leaving the donor car engine running while using its battery to jump start another car.
Never touch any part of the bike with a jumper cable from a battery that's installed in a vehicle with a running engine.
Good Fortune!
in a friends shop I saw the results of a bike that had been jumped from a running car, FRY PUPPY :woohoo:
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Moderators: Street Fighter LTD