pods? vs. Airbox?

More
28 Sep 2011 21:06 #480297 by TexasKZ
Replied by TexasKZ on topic pods? vs. Airbox?

hal0tw0 wrote: what are pods? :whistle:


www.theregister.co.uk/2010/11/02/alien_pod_lake_ufo/

1982 KZ1000 LTD parts donor
1981 KZ1000 LTD awaiting resurrection
2000 ZRX1100 not ridden enough

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
28 Sep 2011 21:07 #480298 by TexasKZ
Replied by TexasKZ on topic pods? vs. Airbox?

hal0tw0 wrote: what are pods? :whistle:



1982 KZ1000 LTD parts donor
1981 KZ1000 LTD awaiting resurrection
2000 ZRX1100 not ridden enough

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
29 Sep 2011 14:26 #480438 by daveo
Replied by daveo on topic pods? vs. Airbox?
I have a working-solution that utilizes the stock air box!
It works with a stock paper air filter, K&N KA-1600, (probably others)...so there is NO ADDITIONAL FILTER COST (NO compromise to engine protection), as with totally exposed pod-filters.

When applied on my KZ1100A-2, the engine-performance increase is beyond my expectation.
The thing is so simple it (still) rattles my mind. There is no need to modify anything, except just disregard the sticker "obstruction warning" label on the gas tank.

Now what? I just wonder if anyone might have an idea how I might (best) market this thing. I'm thinking of calling it RETRO-FLOW, since it is designed to work on these old(er) 80's Kaw/airbox bikes.


1982 KZ1100-A2

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
More
29 Sep 2011 16:56 #480451 by daveo
Replied by daveo on topic pods? vs. Airbox?
Dear P21,

How difficult is it to access your bike's airbox to change the filter?
Would it be possible to post a picture (with the seat up) of the airbox/snorkel cover, showing part of the gas tank in the shot? But only if not too much trouble...
My email: co-des@sbcglobal.net


I am considering marketing something on ebay that will adapt to the airbox, and allow a substantial increase of un-restricted airflow to the engine, thereby enhancing power and performance...without sacrificing the functionality (and simplicity) of the stock air system.

Thanks,
Dave/Conceptual Designs

1982 KZ1100-A2

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
29 Sep 2011 17:15 #480453 by bountyhunter
Replied by bountyhunter on topic pods? vs. Airbox?

daveo wrote: Dear P21,




I am considering marketing something on ebay that will adapt to the airbox, and allow a substantial increase of un-restricted airflow to the engine, thereby enhancing power and performance...

Problem with bikes is that substantially increasing airflow will not always result in more power or performance, unless you also have the way to change the jetting and needle taper to match the new flow characteristics.

I found out (the hard way) that even very minor changes from year to year have big effects. I got a new set of carb slides for my "79 750 twin Mikuni BS-38 carbs..... except they were from the next year after and the slides/needles had been slightly tweaked and they ran TERRIBLE in mine. Surprising how a small change can have such a big effect.

1979 KZ-750 Twin

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
29 Sep 2011 17:23 #480456 by daveo
Replied by daveo on topic pods? vs. Airbox?
Remember the old hot rod cars with air cleaner covers turned upside-down? A pic of one of those to head my KZ1000 KZ1100 ebay listing...might get some attention.
Thanks!

1982 KZ1100-A2

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
29 Sep 2011 17:25 #480457 by daveo
Replied by daveo on topic pods? vs. Airbox?
Dear P21,

How difficult is it to access your bike's airbox to change the filter?
Would it be possible to post a picture (with the seat up) of the airbox/snorkel cover, showing part of the gas tank in the shot? But only if not too much trouble...
My email: co-des@sbcglobal.netThis e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it


I am considering marketing something on ebay that will adapt to the airbox, and allow a substantial increase of un-restricted airflow to the engine, thereby enhancing power and performance...without sacrificing the functionality (and simplicity) of the stock air system.

Thanks,
Dave/Conceptual Designs

1982 KZ1100-A2

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
29 Sep 2011 17:34 #480460 by daveo
Replied by daveo on topic pods? vs. Airbox?
I understand that tuning is critical, but not much is being done in this case. It's primarily for a stock, original carb and exhaust system bike, like mine.
One might consider my idea a very-minor modification, but with exponential return on investment.

1982 KZ1100-A2

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
30 Sep 2011 04:42 #480571 by bountyhunter
Replied by bountyhunter on topic pods? vs. Airbox?

daveo wrote: Remember the old hot rod cars with air cleaner covers turned upside-down? A pic of one of those to head my KZ1000 KZ1100 ebay listing...might get some attention.
Thanks!

Yeah, I started hot rodding back in the 60's. The thing was, those engines (carburetored) were so restricted at intake and exhaust that doing almost anything to reduce backpressure or intake restriction increased power. Motorcycles are the opposite: they are so finely tuned to deliver power across the full RPM band that most any change will screw something up.Even the "performance" headers which do increase power a bit do it at the expense of low end power and torque. Increasing airflow into the intake can give more peak HP, assuming you can rich up the jetting enough to balance it. That's why pods are good for racing, but changing the intake flow might give a higher peak but not have as much at lower RPMs. It would be good to see a before and after dyno plot. If you really found a mod that will increase power across the band, bike makers will pay big money for it.

1979 KZ-750 Twin

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Powered by Kunena Forum