sidexside comparison std. vs. 1075cc

  • 531blackbanshee
  • 531blackbanshee's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Vendor
  • Vendor
    Vendors
  • Posts: 7442
  • Thanks: 796

sidexside comparison std. vs. 1075cc

17 Jun 2016 07:41 - 17 Jun 2016 07:53
#731747
while doing a 1075cc overbore on some std.j model cylinders i snapped a couple shots to show the difference in cylinder wall thickness as it has come up a few times in the past.







leon
skiatook,oklahoma 1980 z1r,1978 kz 1000 z1r x 3,
1976 kz 900 x 3
i make what i can,and save the rest!

billybiltit.blogspot.com/

www.kzrider.com/forum/5-chassis/325862-triple-tree-custom-work

kzrider.com/forum/5-chassis/294594-frame-bracing?limitstart=0
Last edit: 17 Jun 2016 07:53 by 531blackbanshee.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • SWest
  • SWest's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Sustaining Member
  • Sustaining Member
    Registered
  • 10 22 2014
  • Posts: 23779
  • Thanks: 3045

Re: sidexside comparison std. vs. 1075cc

17 Jun 2016 08:08
#731750
Looks like my 903 bores after installing a 1015 kit. Got a 1015 block and am wondering it it can be bored to 1105. Don't look like it. :unsure:
Steve

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • 531blackbanshee
  • 531blackbanshee's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Vendor
  • Vendor
    Vendors
  • Posts: 7442
  • Thanks: 796

Re: sidexside comparison std. vs. 1075cc

17 Jun 2016 11:44
#731772
steve,
here is a page from the wiseco catalog.




it looks as though they believe 1105 cc to be the last overbore on your 1015 cyl.

leon
skiatook,oklahoma 1980 z1r,1978 kz 1000 z1r x 3,
1976 kz 900 x 3
i make what i can,and save the rest!

billybiltit.blogspot.com/

www.kzrider.com/forum/5-chassis/325862-triple-tree-custom-work

kzrider.com/forum/5-chassis/294594-frame-bracing?limitstart=0
The following user(s) said Thank You: SWest

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • DFIGPZ
  • DFIGPZ's Avatar
  • Offline
  • User
  • User
    Registered
  • Posts: 615
  • Thanks: 121

Re: sidexside comparison std. vs. 1075cc

17 Jun 2016 14:01
#731796
you should see 750 turbo cylinders after 810 overbore.
1984 750 Turbo

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Nessism
  • Nessism's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Sustaining Member
  • Sustaining Member
    Registered
  • Posts: 8205
  • Thanks: 3577

Re: sidexside comparison std. vs. 1075cc

17 Jun 2016 16:17
#731799
DFIGPZ wrote: you should see 750 turbo cylinders after 810 overbore.

I assume you are referring to them being thin. That's why I didn't want to bore my 750 to 810. Makes me nervous.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • SWest
  • SWest's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Sustaining Member
  • Sustaining Member
    Registered
  • 10 22 2014
  • Posts: 23779
  • Thanks: 3045

Re: sidexside comparison std. vs. 1075cc

17 Jun 2016 17:06
#731803
My 1015 in my 903 block did seem to run hot. I got my 1015 block and it was like normal. I'd have to get the sleeves bored for the 1105 but I think bigger sleeves is a better idea. That means opening the case more to accept them. I ran the 1015/903 block for years with a oil cooler. The 1105 will be mandatory. :dry:
Steve

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • KZB2 650
  • KZB2 650's Avatar
  • Offline
  • User
  • User
    Registered
  • Posts: 1472
  • Thanks: 264

Re: sidexside comparison std. vs. 1075cc

17 Jun 2016 17:13
#731805
That really shows the diff ....... my 700cc bore did about the same to my 650....... can see why they did away with the 720 and 740 kit although I'm sure some of it was to reduce inventory too.
1978 KZ650 b-2
700cc Wiseco kit 10 to 1.
1980 KZ750 cam, ape springs, stock clutch/ Barnett springs.
Vance and Hines Header w/ comp baffle and Ape pods, Dyna S and green coils, copper wires.
29MM smooth bores W/ 17.5 pilots, 0-6s and 117.5 main
16/42 gearing X ring chain and alum rear JT sprocket.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • SWest
  • SWest's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Sustaining Member
  • Sustaining Member
    Registered
  • 10 22 2014
  • Posts: 23779
  • Thanks: 3045

Re: sidexside comparison std. vs. 1075cc

17 Jun 2016 17:30
#731806
It doesn't make sense to me going less than 50cc. If I do decide to go bigger it will be 1105 or I will stay with the 100cc overbore. In my case the 750 crank was a good idea at the time but I didn't know the stroke was shorter.That was in the 80's and not much was known about the Z2 750. I think I would get more ponies with a 903 crank and hotter cams. B)
Steve

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • zed1015
  • zed1015's Avatar
  • Offline
  • User
  • User
    Registered
  • Posts: 3362
  • Thanks: 2072

Re: sidexside comparison std. vs. 1075cc

19 Jun 2016 03:02 - 19 Jun 2016 07:03
#731964
swest wrote: It doesn't make sense to me going less than 50cc. If I do decide to go bigger it will be 1105 or I will stay with the 100cc overbore. In my case the 750 crank was a good idea at the time but I didn't know the stroke was shorter.That was in the 80's and not much was known about the Z2 750. I think I would get more ponies with a 903 crank and hotter cams. B)
Steve

Only go 1105cc as a last resort on a worn 1075cc liners.
1105 leaves the liner spigot very thin and is prone to cracking and also excess oil usage.
Don't ruin a good set of 1015 liners going 1105.
you won't really see a worthwhile difference over 1075.
AIR CORRECTOR JETS FOR VM CARBS AND ETHANOL RESISTANT VITON CHOKE PLUNGER SEAL REPLACMENT FOR ALL CLASSIC AND MODERN MOTORCYCLE CARBURETTORS
www.kzrider.com/forum/23-for-sale/611992...lide-mikunis?start=1






Last edit: 19 Jun 2016 07:03 by zed1015.
The following user(s) said Thank You: SWest

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Moderators: Street Fighter LTD
Powered by Kunena Forum