Zephyrrider wrote: Just checked my parts cd - Standard settings for 1982 KZ750 H3 should be :
Pilot Jet : #35
Primary : 62 or 65
Secondary : 90 or 125 .
Jet Needle : #N01A.
Just a thought but is that a Dynajet kit in there and standard airbox ?
JBM - Ohio.
Diaphragms if they have yours are $19.50 each plus $27 international so a set of 4 with post for $105 is pretty damn good.
Thanks Zephyrrider, the jets have the Keihin stamp on them so assume its not Dynojet they look pretty old and original.
Airbox & filter are standard and exhaust is standard 4 into 2.
My Haynes manual seems to say the same, ie that all E,H and L models should have35, 62 & 125 jets for pilot main & Secondary, but it says the N1 models (which are the spectres) run 35, 65 & 90 jets. The thing is ive now checked my frame number and my bike model is actually a 1983 H4 model, so im not sure whats going on as it has the jet setting for the spectre N1's? Strange, but anyway as i mentioned earlier ive changed the jet size to a 132 and seeing as they seem to be the exact same CV34 carbs for all models im hoping this will balance it out.
Im thinking the Spectre must of had a different size airbox and exhaust back flow pressure hence the need for the much smaller secondary main jets? and that someone at somepoint has replaced the carbs on my H4 for a second hand set of CV34 carbs but perhaps accidentally picked up the spectre model ones and havent checked the jet sizes? otherwise i dont know why someone would go from 125's to 90's? unless they had an aftemarket exhaust i guess.
Thats pretty good value for the diaphragms, thanks for the lead, ill chase a few other things up like the valves etc and then invest in a new set if all else fails.
JR Wrote:
"Regarding the jet sizes for sure if I had 90 secondary mains in my carbs then I would have less gas flow and lean running but this does not happen in the Spectre and the only reason I can think of is that the Spectre carbs have different needles. I have never seen a Spectre carb needle but if you examine one you may find the number from the Haynes manual stamped on it. Also see if it is adjustable. Does it have grooves for a little clip so that it can be raised and lowered ?
To help identify your bike there is some info on frame numbers on page 6 of the Haynes. Also see the table below.
So now with the 132 jets and clean passages you cant rev over about 6k you got a good idle but still cant get over 6000 rpm.
I"m starting to run low on ideas but am thinking that holes in the diaphragms could be the cause ....if your repair has washed off. Or poorly fitting .......failing to raise the needle all the way under vacuum
Clean air filter and everything ship shape in that area ?
What colour are your spark plugs ?
Checking valve clearance would be a good idea with a new bike with no history
Battery voltage ? grasping at straws here
What exhaust have you got ? original or 4 into 1 ? I have 130 secondary main and a 4 into 1 exhaust + stock airbox and filter"
Thanks for the frame number diagram, i now know my bike is the 1983 H4 model, checked the needle its a N01A which is correct & it doesn't have the adjustable clip settings it seems, just a screw out head.
Checked the diaphragm fix and it seems to be holding well no leaks as far as i can tell, i used black flexible chemical resistant gasket maker for the job and seems to have worked a treat. As i said above though i think i will replace them if i cant figure this out, it just seems odd because everything should in theory be working well now i double checked all the channels and jets etc and they seem fine. Could the slides be sticking for some reason maybe? they seem pretty clean too though.
Airbox and filter standard and exhaust standard 4 into 2. Air filter looks clean but ill take it off and give it a wash out anyway just to eliminate another variable.
spark plugs are new, but ones i took out were not fouled they just looked blackish to normal colour.
Battery is holding decent charge and bike turns over well every time on the button.
Do you guys think bad valve clearances could cause the not revving above 6k symptoms or do you think im barking up the wrong tree there?
Cheers!