- Posts: 5
- Thank you received: 0
530 chain conversion
- Terez
- Topic Author
- Offline
- User
Less
More
03 May 2006 07:39 #44766
by Terez
530 chain conversion was created by Terez
Is the 530 chain conversion a worthwhile improvement?
My 82 GPZ 750 has the original 630 setup with 13/33 gearing.
The original sprockets are on it and are pooched although the previous owner put a new 630 chain on it just before I bought it. ( cheap bastard left the sprockets alone though!)
So...
I figured I may consider the 530 conversion and buy a new chain anyway.
Is the 530 setup markedly freer running/revving?
I know a new 530 will be far stronger than the oem 630 is.
Also, I want to go to a larger front sprocket to get rid of the stupidly small 13.
The 83 and up Gpz use 15/38 stock.
Is this setup a bolton to my 82?
The 82 is a twin rear shock bike where the 83 and up are Unitrak.
I'm thinking 15/41 would be good?
Thanks
My 82 GPZ 750 has the original 630 setup with 13/33 gearing.
The original sprockets are on it and are pooched although the previous owner put a new 630 chain on it just before I bought it. ( cheap bastard left the sprockets alone though!)
So...
I figured I may consider the 530 conversion and buy a new chain anyway.
Is the 530 setup markedly freer running/revving?
I know a new 530 will be far stronger than the oem 630 is.
Also, I want to go to a larger front sprocket to get rid of the stupidly small 13.
The 83 and up Gpz use 15/38 stock.
Is this setup a bolton to my 82?
The 82 is a twin rear shock bike where the 83 and up are Unitrak.
I'm thinking 15/41 would be good?
Thanks
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- steell
- Offline
- User
03 May 2006 09:56 #44795
by steell
KD9JUR
Replied by steell on topic 530 chain conversion
Your 82 has the clutch cable on the left, correct? that means there is a clutch pusher rod going through the trans shaft and sticking out in front of the sprocket.
The 83 clutch cable is on the right side on the clutch cover and has no clutch pusher rod sticking out on the left side. So the 83 has room for a 15 tooth 630 sprocket, and I don't believe a 15 tooth 630 sprocket will fit on the 82, because that clutch pusher rod is in the way. IIRC, Ten6 tried to put a 15 tooth 630 sprocket on a KZ750E motor in a 83 GPz750 frame, and ran into that problem.
The 83 clutch cable is on the right side on the clutch cover and has no clutch pusher rod sticking out on the left side. So the 83 has room for a 15 tooth 630 sprocket, and I don't believe a 15 tooth 630 sprocket will fit on the 82, because that clutch pusher rod is in the way. IIRC, Ten6 tried to put a 15 tooth 630 sprocket on a KZ750E motor in a 83 GPz750 frame, and ran into that problem.
KD9JUR
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- apeman
- Offline
- User
Less
More
- Posts: 346
- Thank you received: 3
03 May 2006 11:45 #44826
by apeman
Petaluma and Truckee, CA -- member since Jan. 23, 2003;
PREVIOUS KZs: 1980 KZ750H with 108,000 miles; 1980 KZ750E with 28,000 miles; and KZ750H street/cafe project, all sold a few years back.
This is what I do for fun, not for work. It is art, with a little engineering thrown in.
Replied by apeman on topic 530 chain conversion
I concur with Steell on the sprocket size issue. The largest size front sprocket you can fit on a 750 with the clutch cable entering on the left side of the sprocket cover is 14 teeth (I have that on my KZ750H -- it JUST BARELY fits). Of course, this presumes that you will be sticking with a 630 chain size. If you go with the 530 size, then it will allow a larger number of teeth on the same outside diameter sprocket, I believe.
Petaluma and Truckee, CA -- member since Jan. 23, 2003;
PREVIOUS KZs: 1980 KZ750H with 108,000 miles; 1980 KZ750E with 28,000 miles; and KZ750H street/cafe project, all sold a few years back.
This is what I do for fun, not for work. It is art, with a little engineering thrown in.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- guitargeek
- Offline
- User
- Elitist, arrogant, intolerant, self absorbed.
Less
More
- Posts: 1183
- Thank you received: 50
03 May 2006 12:55 #44844
by guitargeek
1980 KZ750-H1 (slightly altered)
1987 KZ1000-P6 "Ponch"
1979 GS1000 "Dadzuki"
Replied by guitargeek on topic 530 chain conversion
I'm also considering the 530 conversion for my 1980 KZ750H.
So just how big a front sprocket can we use if we switch to 530? What size rear sprocket should we use to keep the revs down on the highway? How many links of 530 do we need?
So just how big a front sprocket can we use if we switch to 530? What size rear sprocket should we use to keep the revs down on the highway? How many links of 530 do we need?
1980 KZ750-H1 (slightly altered)
1987 KZ1000-P6 "Ponch"
1979 GS1000 "Dadzuki"
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- bluegill
- Offline
- User
Less
More
- Posts: 57
- Thank you received: 1
03 May 2006 19:07 #44918
by bluegill
Replied by bluegill on topic 530 chain conversion
I did it on my 750E with Jeff@z1's advice. It's worth a call to him. Our discussion...
tinyurl.com/pm22n
tinyurl.com/pm22n
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- guitargeek
- Offline
- User
- Elitist, arrogant, intolerant, self absorbed.
Less
More
- Posts: 1183
- Thank you received: 50
03 May 2006 19:44 #44923
by guitargeek
1980 KZ750-H1 (slightly altered)
1987 KZ1000-P6 "Ponch"
1979 GS1000 "Dadzuki"
Replied by guitargeek on topic 530 chain conversion
15T front, 38T rear gives 2.53:1 - very similar to stock
16T front, 41T rear gives 2.56:1 - just slighter lower gearing
15T front, 41T rear gives 2.73:1 - lower gearing - if you do 4500 rpm at 60 mph, them it raises the RPM to 4836 rpm at 60 mph
So what kind of ratio would a 16T front and a 38T rear give? Can I use a 16T front sprocket on my bike?
I'm NOT going to be drag racing my bike, I'm looking for better fuel economy and extended engine life... and maybe an enhanced top speed...
16T front, 41T rear gives 2.56:1 - just slighter lower gearing
15T front, 41T rear gives 2.73:1 - lower gearing - if you do 4500 rpm at 60 mph, them it raises the RPM to 4836 rpm at 60 mph
So what kind of ratio would a 16T front and a 38T rear give? Can I use a 16T front sprocket on my bike?
I'm NOT going to be drag racing my bike, I'm looking for better fuel economy and extended engine life... and maybe an enhanced top speed...
1980 KZ750-H1 (slightly altered)
1987 KZ1000-P6 "Ponch"
1979 GS1000 "Dadzuki"
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- KZQ
- Offline
- Administrator
- Walking Behind the Corn May Not Be All That!
Less
More
- Posts: 4829
- Thank you received: 1394
03 May 2006 20:19 #44939
by KZQ
www.KZ1300.com
Riders:
1968 BSA 441 Shooting Star, 1970 BSA 650 Lightning, 1974 W3, 1976 KZ900, 1979 KZ750 Twin, 1979 KZ750 Twin Trike, 1981 KZ1300, 1982 KZ1100 Spectre, 2000 Valkyrie, 2009 Yamaha Roadliner S. 1983 GL 1100
Projects:
1985 ZN1300
Replied by KZQ on topic 530 chain conversion
Hey Geek,
I tried a 16 tooth on my 900 and took it off pretty quickly. It did change the various sweet spots but in doing so only made the bike less streetable.
As far as improving mileage, I doubt that the payback is linear. By that I mean that in order to get down the road a given amount of work has to be done. Running at a higher or lower RPM has less effect on mileage than adding or subtracting weight.
Good luck
Bill
I tried a 16 tooth on my 900 and took it off pretty quickly. It did change the various sweet spots but in doing so only made the bike less streetable.
As far as improving mileage, I doubt that the payback is linear. By that I mean that in order to get down the road a given amount of work has to be done. Running at a higher or lower RPM has less effect on mileage than adding or subtracting weight.
Good luck
Bill
www.KZ1300.com
Riders:
1968 BSA 441 Shooting Star, 1970 BSA 650 Lightning, 1974 W3, 1976 KZ900, 1979 KZ750 Twin, 1979 KZ750 Twin Trike, 1981 KZ1300, 1982 KZ1100 Spectre, 2000 Valkyrie, 2009 Yamaha Roadliner S. 1983 GL 1100
Projects:
1985 ZN1300
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- guitargeek
- Offline
- User
- Elitist, arrogant, intolerant, self absorbed.
Less
More
- Posts: 1183
- Thank you received: 50
08 May 2006 15:24 #45969
by guitargeek
1980 KZ750-H1 (slightly altered)
1987 KZ1000-P6 "Ponch"
1979 GS1000 "Dadzuki"
Replied by guitargeek on topic 530 chain conversion
I tried a 16 tooth on my 900 and took it off pretty quickly. It did change the various sweet spots but in doing so only made the bike less streetable.
What'd you have for a back sprocket? What do you mean by "less streetable"? Too slow off the line?
What'd you have for a back sprocket? What do you mean by "less streetable"? Too slow off the line?
1980 KZ750-H1 (slightly altered)
1987 KZ1000-P6 "Ponch"
1979 GS1000 "Dadzuki"
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- KZQ
- Offline
- Administrator
- Walking Behind the Corn May Not Be All That!
Less
More
- Posts: 4829
- Thank you received: 1394
09 May 2006 19:17 #46242
by KZQ
www.KZ1300.com
Riders:
1968 BSA 441 Shooting Star, 1970 BSA 650 Lightning, 1974 W3, 1976 KZ900, 1979 KZ750 Twin, 1979 KZ750 Twin Trike, 1981 KZ1300, 1982 KZ1100 Spectre, 2000 Valkyrie, 2009 Yamaha Roadliner S. 1983 GL 1100
Projects:
1985 ZN1300
Replied by KZQ on topic 530 chain conversion
Hi GG,
I have the standard 35 tooth rear sproket. By less streetable I mean that it seemed that the shift points between first and second and second and third had moved right to where I had become used to laying the power on around town. As soon as I had the 16 tooth sproket on, I realized that Ma Kaw's engineers had already picked the best setup for all around street use so I went back to it.
It's what worked for me.
Bill
Post edited by: KZCSI, at: 2006/05/09 22:18
I have the standard 35 tooth rear sproket. By less streetable I mean that it seemed that the shift points between first and second and second and third had moved right to where I had become used to laying the power on around town. As soon as I had the 16 tooth sproket on, I realized that Ma Kaw's engineers had already picked the best setup for all around street use so I went back to it.
It's what worked for me.
Bill
Post edited by: KZCSI, at: 2006/05/09 22:18
www.KZ1300.com
Riders:
1968 BSA 441 Shooting Star, 1970 BSA 650 Lightning, 1974 W3, 1976 KZ900, 1979 KZ750 Twin, 1979 KZ750 Twin Trike, 1981 KZ1300, 1982 KZ1100 Spectre, 2000 Valkyrie, 2009 Yamaha Roadliner S. 1983 GL 1100
Projects:
1985 ZN1300
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- guitargeek
- Offline
- User
- Elitist, arrogant, intolerant, self absorbed.
Less
More
- Posts: 1183
- Thank you received: 50
09 May 2006 20:48 #46265
by guitargeek
1980 KZ750-H1 (slightly altered)
1987 KZ1000-P6 "Ponch"
1979 GS1000 "Dadzuki"
Replied by guitargeek on topic 530 chain conversion
KZCSI wrote:
So this is with a 630 chain?
Hi GG,
I have the standard 35 tooth rear sproket.
So this is with a 630 chain?
1980 KZ750-H1 (slightly altered)
1987 KZ1000-P6 "Ponch"
1979 GS1000 "Dadzuki"
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Bdog
- Offline
- User
- Sweep the leg johnny!!!
Less
More
- Posts: 182
- Thank you received: 10
11 May 2006 19:33 #46714
by Bdog
kzrider.com/forum/11-projects/338400-a-little-bit-of-an-upgrade
'77 KZ650-C1 -- build
810 kit
GPZ cams and carbs
ZX6R front end
GSXR600 Rear
Kerker
Dyna
Accel
ContiMotion tires (120/60-17&170/60-17)
Replied by Bdog on topic 530 chain conversion
Light years ahead of all you guys. I recently had a buddy of mine's 01 r6 in the garage, and he'd done a 520 conversion. Yep, you guessed it, the 77 kz650 and 900/1000s countershaft is the same toothing and size as an '01 r6. Ebay search r6 and find the chain stuff. I had the guy on the phone send me a 120 link 520 chain, front sprocket from r6 (15 tooth)and rear sprocket that would fit a kawasaki bolt pattern (40 tooth) for @ $150 shipped. Now that saves weight over a 630!!!
BdogB)
BdogB)
kzrider.com/forum/11-projects/338400-a-little-bit-of-an-upgrade
'77 KZ650-C1 -- build
810 kit
GPZ cams and carbs
ZX6R front end
GSXR600 Rear
Kerker
Dyna
Accel
ContiMotion tires (120/60-17&170/60-17)
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.