- Posts: 23027
- Thank you received: 2758
Cam wear
- SWest
- Offline
- Sustaining Member
- 10 22 2014
Less
More
10 May 2023 11:55 #884483
by SWest
Replied by SWest on topic Cam wear
Close up of the lobes would help.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Wookie58
- Away
- Moderator
Less
More
- Posts: 4180
- Thank you received: 2388
10 May 2023 13:03 #884484
by Wookie58
Replied by Wookie58 on topic Cam wear
What model is your 82, J-K-M or P ?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- blipco
- Offline
- User
- 2002 KZ1000P
Less
More
- Posts: 555
- Thank you received: 212
10 May 2023 13:51 - 10 May 2023 13:52 #884485
by blipco
"Swim against the current, even a dead fish can go with the flow"-somebody (I forget Who)
Replied by blipco on topic Cam wear
Thanks for posting the pics. The lobes don’t look that bad by my eye, I wouldn’t have thought to measure. Somebody please point out something that would have tipped me off.
I have a ZRX which is well known for having cam lobes which wear through the case hardening in places at very low miles. You can see the cast iron in the holes. But they seem to stop wearing any further by 20 - 30 thousand miles. The wear doesn’t cause any issues outside of crapping your pants the first time you see it.
I have a ZRX which is well known for having cam lobes which wear through the case hardening in places at very low miles. You can see the cast iron in the holes. But they seem to stop wearing any further by 20 - 30 thousand miles. The wear doesn’t cause any issues outside of crapping your pants the first time you see it.
"Swim against the current, even a dead fish can go with the flow"-somebody (I forget Who)
Last edit: 10 May 2023 13:52 by blipco.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Wookie58
- Away
- Moderator
Less
More
- Posts: 4180
- Thank you received: 2388
10 May 2023 14:15 #884489
by Wookie58
Replied by Wookie58 on topic Cam wear
I have to say (IMHO) I think those lobes don't look to have worn nearly a full millimetre. I would have expected them to be dull not shiney as they would have been well and truly worn through the hardening ?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- timewaster
- Topic Author
- Offline
- User
Less
More
- Posts: 14
- Thank you received: 1
10 May 2023 14:17 #884493
by timewaster
Replied by timewaster on topic Cam wear
I bought it used, but as far as I'm able to tell, it's a J.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Wookie58
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- TexasKZ
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Posts: 7581
- Thank you received: 2234
10 May 2023 15:26 - 10 May 2023 15:31 #884497
by TexasKZ
1982 KZ1000 LTD parts donor
1981 KZ1000 LTD awaiting resurrection
2000 ZRX1100 not ridden enough
Replied by TexasKZ on topic Cam wear
The camshafts in that picture are from a KZ1000K, LTD, so they are still within spec.
See page 6-19 in the fsm for how to identify the camshafts.
www.kzrider.com/modules/ServiceManuals/K...Service%20Manual.pdf
You can check the frame and engine numbers here—
www.kzrider.com/filebase?task=download.s...id=1178&catid=64&m=0
See page 6-19 in the fsm for how to identify the camshafts.
www.kzrider.com/modules/ServiceManuals/K...Service%20Manual.pdf
You can check the frame and engine numbers here—
www.kzrider.com/filebase?task=download.s...id=1178&catid=64&m=0
1982 KZ1000 LTD parts donor
1981 KZ1000 LTD awaiting resurrection
2000 ZRX1100 not ridden enough
Last edit: 10 May 2023 15:31 by TexasKZ.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Nessism, Mikaw
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- timewaster
- Topic Author
- Offline
- User
Less
More
- Posts: 14
- Thank you received: 1
12 May 2023 12:06 #884551
by timewaster
Replied by timewaster on topic Cam wear
Thanks for that. I've been under the impression since I got it that it was a J. The table that you published confirmed that it was indeed a K. Looking at that information, the lobe that is worn most worn is still barely in spec.
Just out of curiosity, how were you able to tell by looking at the cams?
Many thanks, that will make things easier from here on out.
Just out of curiosity, how were you able to tell by looking at the cams?
Many thanks, that will make things easier from here on out.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- blipco
- Offline
- User
- 2002 KZ1000P
Less
More
- Posts: 555
- Thank you received: 212
12 May 2023 13:42 #884561
by blipco
"Swim against the current, even a dead fish can go with the flow"-somebody (I forget Who)
Replied by blipco on topic Cam wear
To me, from the pics you posted, the cam lobes look fine. They looked like any cam I have ever seen in an engine.
Oil starved or otherwise damaged cams look it.
Oil starved or otherwise damaged cams look it.
"Swim against the current, even a dead fish can go with the flow"-somebody (I forget Who)
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- TexasKZ
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Posts: 7581
- Thank you received: 2234
12 May 2023 14:51 #884564
by TexasKZ
1982 KZ1000 LTD parts donor
1981 KZ1000 LTD awaiting resurrection
2000 ZRX1100 not ridden enough
Replied by TexasKZ on topic Cam wear
See page 6-19 in he fsm for camshaft identification.Thanks for that. I've been under the impression since I got it that it was a J. The table that you published confirmed that it was indeed a K. Looking at that information, the lobe that is worn most worn is still barely in spec.
Just out of curiosity, how were you able to tell by looking at the cams?
Many thanks, that will make things easier from here on out.
1982 KZ1000 LTD parts donor
1981 KZ1000 LTD awaiting resurrection
2000 ZRX1100 not ridden enough
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.