- Posts: 70
- Thank you received: 3
77 KZ650 typical current draw before start?
- cjaldous
- Topic Author
- Offline
- User
I bought a 77 KZ650 last weekend (see pic), and have been working on some electrical issues while I wait for the title.
The bike is mostly stock except for dyna s ignition and 3 ohm dyna coils. I have new plugs, wires, and 5 ohm coils on order.
With the key turned on (ignition), and the engine switch off I measure about 2 amps.
With the key turned on (ignition), and the engine switch on I measure about 4 amps.
Does that current draw sound reasonable?
The 2 amp draw with engine switch off seemed high, and since I've found some of the POs "interesting" wiring choices, I'm not always sure what to trust.
Attachment IMG_20150606_155009776.jpg not found
1977 KZ650B
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- SWest
- Offline
- Sustaining Member
- 10 22 2014
- Posts: 22972
- Thank you received: 2749
Steve
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- cjaldous
- Topic Author
- Offline
- User
- Posts: 70
- Thank you received: 3
1977 KZ650B
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- SWest
- Offline
- Sustaining Member
- 10 22 2014
- Posts: 22972
- Thank you received: 2749
Steve
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- cjaldous
- Topic Author
- Offline
- User
- Posts: 70
- Thank you received: 3
One coil's secondary measured 12-15k. The other measured 150k, and then 1G after more testing.
That's why I'm replacing the coils, and figured new wires and plugs would be nice.
I'll charge the battery and recheck the current draw.
1977 KZ650B
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- cjaldous
- Topic Author
- Offline
- User
- Posts: 70
- Thank you received: 3
1977 KZ650B
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- SWest
- Offline
- Sustaining Member
- 10 22 2014
- Posts: 22972
- Thank you received: 2749
Steve
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- loudhvx
- Offline
- KZr Legend
- Posts: 10868
- Thank you received: 1616
When you turn the ignition on, then the Dyna S draws current through one or both coils. 4 amps seems low, but maybe the amp meter is not that accurate, and/or you have some losses in the wiring. As with the field coil, the resistance will go up as it heats up, so the longer you have the switch on, the lower the current will get. Do not leave the key and ign on for long. You can cook the Dyna S, or the coils, and same goes for the field coil.
1981 KZ550 D1 gpz.
Kz550 valve train warning.
Other links.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Tyrell Corp
- Offline
- User
- "You were made as well as we could make you"
- Posts: 1650
- Thank you received: 261
1980 Gpz550 D1, 1981 GPz550 D1. 1982 GPz750R1. 1983 z1000R R2. all four aces
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- loudhvx
- Offline
- KZr Legend
- Posts: 10868
- Thank you received: 1616
Yes, way more efficient for crankshaft power, and it allows you to use a more powerful alternator since it won't be so wasteful. This allows you to have a much wider range of varying loads (like on a car). The one KZ650 I tested would get nearly 14v at idle. (And stay at just over 14 at higher RPMs.)Tyrell Corp wrote: Interesting...Isn't a field coil better than a permanent magnet rotor? nice idea to directly modulate the current output to the demand, rather than charging all the time, to shunt and dump the excess.
I think the permanent-magnet 650 alternators that followed, in 78 and 79, were made with just enough power to run the bike, so the regulator wouldn't have to dump as much extra power, and the crank would use minimal power for generating electricity, but they may have cut it too close. They didn't really leave enough extra capacity in case someone added lights or a more consuming ignition (like the Dyna S). They corrected that in late 79 or 80 by converting to 3-phase.
The problem with the 77 system is that they didn't take full advantage of the efficiency. They didn't go the one extra step of running a dedicated output from the rectifier to power the field. I call this extra output the "aux" output. Had they done this, and added one extra resistor, they would have greatly reduced the current the battery would use in times when the bike was switched on while the crank was not turning. This would also reduce heat in the field coil during those times, and would also free-up more current for the starter during electric-start.
That extra resistor limits the current usage from the battery. Only a tiny bit is needed to get the alternator to start generating some output. Once the alternator is starting to create output, the majority of field-coil power comes from the alternator itself via the dedicated "aux" output.
You've probably seen this type of setup on some other brands of bikes back in the 1970's.
I think, in the end, though, the system was too expensive and complex, so they went with the permanent magnet system, which is better suited for sportier bikes, since they won't be used for Saharan expeditions.
1981 KZ550 D1 gpz.
Kz550 valve train warning.
Other links.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- cjaldous
- Topic Author
- Offline
- User
- Posts: 70
- Thank you received: 3
I assume it requires a different rectifier.
I have a feeling my current readings are low because of battery drain.
I'll make a measurement with a charged battery and new coils when the parts come in.
I ordered from Z1 yesterday, but it looks like my parts haven't shipped yet.
1977 KZ650B
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- loudhvx
- Offline
- KZr Legend
- Posts: 10868
- Thank you received: 1616
1981 KZ550 D1 gpz.
Kz550 valve train warning.
Other links.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.