Equalizer line instead of syncing carbs

I have been known to dream stuff up.
I was once working at this warehouse that had lots of traffic at at a 3-way blind corner. I bought some rope, and cowbells, and some hardware and installed a warning bell just by pulling on the rope when approaching the corner.
Where I work now, we have a lab coat closet where people were constantly leaving the sliding doors open. I bought a weight, some pulleys, and some thin steel cable, and now the weight pulls the doors closed. It has been in use for months with a minimum of repairs.
I had this 1980 Chevy LUV, and went hog wild with gadgets on it. I installed a power hood release, and took a house thermostat, and power transistor, and other items and created climate control on that LUV.
Now, all that to say that every once in a while, my ideas work out.
With all the importance put on syncing carbs, why cannot a equalizer line/tube be put across the intakes of a 4-cyl motorcyle. I am using the stock airbox, and so there is almost no room to do this, but why couldn't someone with pods install a permanent tube, maybe 5/8" I.D., to equalized the vacuum?

Because you could never be able to use the side stand. If you did, all the fuel in the #2-3-4 carbs would flow into your #1 carb and because there would be so much of it, it would run into your cylinder and also out the back. If you forgot to shut of your petcock than you would drain the tank threw your #2-3-4 carbs.

I also forgot. You would have a similar problem in certain slower banking turns. During some of these turns it could be catastrophic because you would flood certain cylinders and starve others. this could mean an engine shut down in a turn.

Okatar, I am talking about the vacuum, and not the float bowl level. Maybe you are ahead of me already, and you know perfectly well what I meant. Or maybe, my idea is glorious, so innovative, so new, that it is hard to comprehend at first. I am the demigod of motorcyles! No one can ever fully comprehend the depth of my knowledge! :evil::woohoo:

this is a rough sketch I created with MS Paint in 5 minutes.I do not see how the fuel down in the float bowls with ever enter the new tube, at least not at sidestand angle.

Sorry My Bad. I don't know where my head was. I was thinking of float bole level adjusting, I don't know why.
What you are saying is actually already there for two of the cylinders that power the pollution valve. The purpose of synchronizing the carburetors is not to create equal vacuum inside the individual intake ports, but to allow each cylinder to run the same RPM during ground idle. This in fact may mean that each carburetor is open differently DEPENDING on the state of each cylinder and its individual vacuum. Once the engine is past ground idle, meaning that the carbs are cracked open even a little bit than this requirement is no longer in affect. When the word synchronizing is being used. it is not the vacuum but the RPM.

So how could two cylinders, assuming the pistons are connected to the same crankshaft, run at different rpms? Doesn't rpm measure crankshaft rotation?

That is the whole problem and reason why you must synchronize the carbs. Because they ARE connected to the same crank shaft they must run the same RPM but because they have separate crarburetion they want to run differently. The result is that some pistons try to drag tee others. Creating a lean situation in some and a loaded situation in others. The Idea is to adjust them individually so they all run the same RPM.

In agreement with TexasKZ, otakar, if I were to read up on carb syncing, I doubt that I would find advice to adjust the carbs to different vac levels on the manometer and/or guages to achieve the best rpm. I would bet that all advice on syncing points toward adjusting the carbs to achieve equal vacuum reading- the ultimate goal being a smooth idle.
I could be wrong, but it seems to me my equalizer tube would be a direct path to what the manometer is for, and that is to get a smooth idle vis a vis all carbs NOT DISAGREEING WITH EACH OTHER for the fuel/air needs of the engine.
IMO, it is difficult to get 4 carbs to do the exact same thing thru all conditions. Fully warmed up, the manometer may say the carbs are unison, but what about when the bike is warming up with fuel enrichment shafts that are anything but consistent with each other>? huh?

You will be assimilated!

Somebody help little otakar up, so he can wrestle with the titans

You should have said "AFTER SYNCING CARBS" as you still want the air flow as even as possible at all RPM's between the cylinders. That is an Idea to hook all 4 together for an improved Idle, try it and post up the results. Say take a hot Idle RPM reading before and after. Tell us what size tube you used etc.

I once interconnected all the 4 vacuum nipples in common and on to the fuel petcock, on a '91 Zepnyr 750. I have the air box and did not have much of a problem, however.....

I did not do it to skip sinchronization as I agree with Otakar, that the purpose of sych'ng is to get all the carbs mechanically in synch, and vacuum is only used as indicator. I did it because read somewhere that it would give smoother idling.

I personally did not notice any improvement. Nada. I least nothing that I could feel or hear. Eventually I took the set up off because did not like the clutter, and went back to the two inside carbs connected to the pectock tap for fuel.