GPz1100 building -

More
15 Jul 2014 19:29 #640193 by GPzEric
GPz1100 building - was created by GPzEric
Hi Guys -

I want some opinions - please -

My bik Kawi is a '82 GPz1100, with stock DFI, a Kerker pipe with loud baffle, and has a Wiseco 1136cc piston kit in it, making the compression 10.25:1 instead of 8.9:1.

My cam bolts came loose on the exhaust cam, and beat up the head.

I found a complete, low mileage head from a '84 GPz1100, and I dropped it off at the shop today, the only bad thread is one of the exhaust studs looks a little ratty.

After breaking out the caliper, it appears that the intake valves are 1mm bigger, the exhaust valves are .5mm bigger, and the valves are maybe tipped a little straighter. Plus the head isn't a hemi head, like the '82, but have had some re-shaping to them.

I'm a little concerned about the bigger valves clearing the Wiseco pistons, so I'm thinking about using the '82 cams instead of the '84 cams, and keeping the higher mid-range, and having a little less lift.

If I use the '84 cams, I'll have the full power of the '84, but I'm also thinking that Kawasaki Motors made the wrist pins in the '84 bigger for a reason, and I'd better not push it.

I've got both computers, the '82 and '85, and the injectors, etc are exactly the same, so tell me guys, what would you do ?

My wife asked me if I still loved her - I said "Honey, I love you more than new carburetor boots ! "
1982 KZ1100B2 (GPz)
1982 KZ750R1 (GPz)
(2) 1981 KZ550D1 (GPz) 1 mint, 1 under construction
1983 GS1100E

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 Jul 2014 20:30 #640204 by Nebr_Rex
Replied by Nebr_Rex on topic GPz1100 building -
You have no where the lift needed to contact the pistons.

2002 ZRX1200R
81 GPz1100
79 KZ1000st daily ride
79 KZ1000mk2 prodject
78 KZ650sr
78 KZ650b
81 KZ750e
80 KZ750ltd
77 KZ400/440 cafe project
76 KZ400/440 Fuel Injected

www.dotheton.com/forum/index.php?topic=39120.0


.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 Jul 2014 20:37 - 15 Jul 2014 20:37 #640206 by GPzEric
Replied by GPzEric on topic GPz1100 building -
If that's the case, I'm thinking to use the '84 cams, as the higher displacement and compression would love the added lift and duration of the '84 cams.

My wife asked me if I still loved her - I said "Honey, I love you more than new carburetor boots ! "
1982 KZ1100B2 (GPz)
1982 KZ750R1 (GPz)
(2) 1981 KZ550D1 (GPz) 1 mint, 1 under construction
1983 GS1100E
Last edit: 15 Jul 2014 20:37 by GPzEric.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 Jul 2014 22:42 #640221 by PLUMMEN
Replied by PLUMMEN on topic GPz1100 building -
You could always put a little modeling clay in the piston valve notches then put the head on with a used head gasket torqued down .
Then turn the motor over by hand a few times and pull the head back off and measure the thickness of the clay in the valve notches with a micrometer,that would give you an idea on the clearances.
Without knowing the specifics of your motor its russian roulette guessing what your clearances are.
Has the cylinder been decked,was the head decked? too many variables. :)

Still recovering,some days are better than others.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
16 Jul 2014 05:00 #640230 by gpz1170
Replied by gpz1170 on topic GPz1100 building -
If you are using the 81/82 pistons with the 83/84 head, they will hit. The 83/84 pistons have different domes. Also the valve angle is different.

don

1974 Z1
1976 KZ900
1978 KZ1000
1981 KZ1000
1983 GPZ1100

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
16 Jul 2014 06:26 #640236 by GPzEric
Replied by GPzEric on topic GPz1100 building -
Nothing has been decked, and running Wiseco pistons makes it a mystery. And I cannot put in '84 pistons because the wrist pins are changed.

My wife asked me if I still loved her - I said "Honey, I love you more than new carburetor boots ! "
1982 KZ1100B2 (GPz)
1982 KZ750R1 (GPz)
(2) 1981 KZ550D1 (GPz) 1 mint, 1 under construction
1983 GS1100E

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
16 Jul 2014 09:36 #640258 by PLUMMEN
Replied by PLUMMEN on topic GPz1100 building -
Send a pm to larry cav

Still recovering,some days are better than others.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
16 Jul 2014 15:48 #640286 by DFIGPZ
Replied by DFIGPZ on topic GPz1100 building -
if you use a 83/84 cylinder head you have to have a piston dome to match since your is a 82 GPZ 1100 inj in the rack assy and not in the head this has the "J" style combustion chamber using the 83/84 head you will be down on compression not to mention valve angles are different your best bet would have been to locate a "J" head and had it redone then painted it black.

1984 750 Turbo

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
16 Jul 2014 16:49 #640295 by Nebr_Rex
Replied by Nebr_Rex on topic GPz1100 building -

gpz1170 wrote: If you are using the 81/82 pistons with the 83/84 head, they will hit. The 83/84 pistons have different domes. Also the valve angle is different.

don


If that's the case, that just thru a money wrench in my plans.
I also was planning on swapping a bathtub head on the "81 I just acquired.
Pretty sure my valve seals are shot. The bathtub head is suppose to have
a 1.5cc smaller chamber. With "83 cams would be a nice upgrade.

..

2002 ZRX1200R
81 GPz1100
79 KZ1000st daily ride
79 KZ1000mk2 prodject
78 KZ650sr
78 KZ650b
81 KZ750e
80 KZ750ltd
77 KZ400/440 cafe project
76 KZ400/440 Fuel Injected

www.dotheton.com/forum/index.php?topic=39120.0


.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
16 Jul 2014 19:19 - 16 Jul 2014 19:21 #640320 by GPzEric
Replied by GPzEric on topic GPz1100 building -
Well, I guess I'll be the guinea pig, and settle the debate, won't I ?

The '84 valves are sunk just a little deeper in the head, giving them more clearance, and looking at pics of the '84 pistons, they have a dome, just like the Wiseco Pistons, and deeper cutouts for valves, just like the Wiseco pistons.

So I'm going to put it together with the '82 Cams, since they have .8mm less lift than the stock '84 cams, and will help with bottom-end power, and give a little more peace-of-mind as far as clearance.

So I will report back as to how much clearance I have, and how many psi of compression I have.

I didn't start out to build a Frankenmotor, just to preserve a piece of motorcycling history !

My wife asked me if I still loved her - I said "Honey, I love you more than new carburetor boots ! "
1982 KZ1100B2 (GPz)
1982 KZ750R1 (GPz)
(2) 1981 KZ550D1 (GPz) 1 mint, 1 under construction
1983 GS1100E
Last edit: 16 Jul 2014 19:21 by GPzEric.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
16 Jul 2014 19:23 #640321 by GPzEric
Replied by GPzEric on topic GPz1100 building -


Here's a comparison from a '83 magazine - not surprisingly the '83/'84 GPz1100 head looks a lot like the Superbike head, only one plug instead of two.

My wife asked me if I still loved her - I said "Honey, I love you more than new carburetor boots ! "
1982 KZ1100B2 (GPz)
1982 KZ750R1 (GPz)
(2) 1981 KZ550D1 (GPz) 1 mint, 1 under construction
1983 GS1100E
The following user(s) said Thank You: Tyrell Corp

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
17 Jul 2014 05:23 - 17 Jul 2014 05:33 #640354 by LarryC
Replied by LarryC on topic GPz1100 building -
By PM request I'm going to post something here.

In this situation you have less to worry about using either cam because as cams go they are baby grinds, especially when used with an aftermarket piston. Wiseco pistons tend to have larger valve pockets than OEM cams because they are designed to be used with true performance cams.

The 83-85 head had the included angle angle altered 1 degree on the exhaust side. That amount with the aftermarket pistons and those little cams [either grind] should not be an issue. BUT HERE'S THE SMART MOVE if you were going to attempt this.

Install valves in one cylinder of the 84 head using light springs. Bolt the head on. You don't actually need a degree wheel but it would be best. You do need a dial indicator setup on the bucket. Also, clay up the piston to get piston to head clearance measurement after you take the head back off again.

Bring the piston to about 10 Degrees BTDC. Turn the crank in small [1 degree increments...as closely as you can estimate that if you don't have a D.W.] As you go, push the valve open with a screw driver on the bucket until it touches and read the dial indicator. Keep doing that until you are 10 degrees past TDC. You want at least .040" clearance on the intake and .060" on the exhaust.

That is the most accurate way to tell what is happening with regard to valve travel and clearance. The old method of poking a piece of solder or wire between the valve is at best a guess. The closest point of contact for valves is often at a position other than TDC. The dial indicator is the only tool that lets you track it through the critical range BTDC & ATDC with any real confidence as to what is actually happening.

As long as you're setup you may as well degree the cams at the same time, providing you used the degree wheel.

After removing the head, cut and measure the clay on the piston dome. I've never tried to use anything but the correct piston for that late model chamber when using that head so I can't tell you what the result will be. The chamber is closed up a bunch on the sides so you might have a contact issue there......the clay will tell the tale...

How about some pics of the beat up head? I might be able to fix that. Photos are a must.

If the head is indeed not cost effective to repair there is always the route of calling MTC and getting some pistons from them. That may lead to a bore job though.

Larry C.
Last edit: 17 Jul 2014 05:33 by LarryC.
The following user(s) said Thank You: PLUMMEN

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Powered by Kunena Forum