- Posts: 67
- Thank you received: 0
Camshafts strangeness...
- Conti
- Topic Author
- Offline
- User
I measured the height of my KZ1000ST camshafts.
Here are the results, in millimeters:
IN: 36.11, 36.24, 36.18, 36.24
EX: 36.27, 36.27, 36.27, 36.27
Here are the values written in the KZ1000ST workshop manual:
IN: standard=36.21-36.39, service limit=36.12
EX: standard=35.71-35.89, service limit=35.62
So, one cam of the inlet camshaft is below the standard limit (36.11mm < 36.12mm). That's not cool.
But what's wrong with the cam heights measured on the exhaust camshaft? I
measured, re-remeasured, and each time I found the same values: 36.27mm on all cams.
That's *ABOVE* the standard height! It should be between 35.71-35.89, and it's 36.27mm!
It's definitely an exhaust camshaft, since there's a tachometer shaft on it.
How could that be the exhaust cams are higher than what is specified in the manual? Could that be a camshaft coming from another motorbike? Should I replace that exhaust camshaft?
Post edited by: Conti, at: 2007/03/26 14:47
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- larrycavan
- Visitor
Service manuals are almost always suplemented with corrections after they are printed. You might be shocked to see how many errors are in OEM manuals...
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- BSKZ650
- Offline
- User
- Posts: 2064
- Thank you received: 14
77 kz650, owned for over 25 years
77 ltd1000, current rider
76 kz900, just waiting
73 z1,, gonna restore this one
piglet, leggero harley davidson
SR, Ride captian, S.E.Texas Patriot Guard Riders.. AKA KawaBob
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- RonKZ650
- Offline
- User
- Posts: 3701
- Thank you received: 240
321,000 miles on KZ's that I can remember. Not going to see any more.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- justme
- Offline
- User
- Posts: 4
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Conti
- Topic Author
- Offline
- User
- Posts: 67
- Thank you received: 0
Here are the results, from left to right:
EX: 24,95 24,95 24,95 24,96 (mm)
ADM: 24,94 24,94 24,95 24,95 (mm)
So, the wear seems to be equal. However, one more time, the figures are completely different from what is written in the manual :
According to the manual, max diameter is 24.480, and that's 0.5mm less than what I measured!
I know start to have some serious doubts about those camshafts...
Moreover, when using some plastiguage to measure the gap between the camshafts and the head, I obtained around 0.38mm. Standard is 0.020 - 0.070 mm, and the service limit is 0.16mm.
The bearing inserts doesn't seem to be in a good shape. But I think the problem also come from those camshafts...
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- BSKZ650
- Offline
- User
- Posts: 2064
- Thank you received: 14
from what I am seeing, the lobes look to be in good shape, look at the bearings, if they are scratched up and wore looking, then replace them, I think you will be just fine
77 kz650, owned for over 25 years
77 ltd1000, current rider
76 kz900, just waiting
73 z1,, gonna restore this one
piglet, leggero harley davidson
SR, Ride captian, S.E.Texas Patriot Guard Riders.. AKA KawaBob
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Conti
- Topic Author
- Offline
- User
- Posts: 67
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- pstrbrc
- Offline
- User
- '81 GPz 1100 project
- Posts: 355
- Thank you received: 9
Don't know your background, but I would say that you really, REALLY like to measure things!
Just a thought...
Do you suppose that somebody has been inside your engine before, and they put an intake cam in place of the exhaust? Kinda looks like that is what you're measuring.
If your bearing clearances are in spec, I would conclude that the manual is suspect. Is it factory Kawasaki, or something like Clymers?
\'81 GPz 1100 project
Elkhart, Kansas USA
\"Man does not control his own fate. The women in his life do that for him.\" Groucho Marx
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Conti
- Topic Author
- Offline
- User
- Posts: 67
- Thank you received: 0
Hmmm...
Don't know your background, but I would say that you really, REALLY like to measure things!
No, not really. :laugh: Indeed, I don't like to do this, but I really want to know the condition of the engine.
pstrbrc wrote:
Just a thought...
Do you suppose that somebody has been inside your engine before, and they put an intake cam in place of the exhaust? Kinda looks like that is what you're measuring.
That's definitely an exhaust camshaft, since there's a tacho shaft on it.
pstrbrc wrote:
If your bearing clearances are in spec, I would conclude that the manual is suspect. Is it factory Kawasaki, or something like Clymers?
That's the original one, edited in 1979 :
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- BSKZ650
- Offline
- User
- Posts: 2064
- Thank you received: 14
77 kz650, owned for over 25 years
77 ltd1000, current rider
76 kz900, just waiting
73 z1,, gonna restore this one
piglet, leggero harley davidson
SR, Ride captian, S.E.Texas Patriot Guard Riders.. AKA KawaBob
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- tuxedotito
- Offline
- User
- Posts: 185
- Thank you received: 0
Looks to be within specification?? 0.38 is almost a half-inch!
Regards...
1981 GPz1100, Wiseco 1170 Kit, BS34 carbs; #40 Pilot and #140 Main, UNI Filters, APE main and cylinder studs, DYNA S, DYNA Coils, and lots of hours. Working towards Megasquirt/Turbo one day!!!
Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.