- Posts: 26
- Thank you received: 0
tires..
- rotinaj13
- Topic Author
- Offline
- User
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- wireman
- Visitor
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- rotinaj13
- Topic Author
- Offline
- User
- Posts: 26
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- wireman
- Visitor
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Leather
- Offline
- User
- Posts: 76
- Thank you received: 1
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- steell
- Offline
- User
You can run them tubeless, but be prepared for a real interesting ride (and to change your underware at a minimum) if one of them gets low on air.
Post edited by: steell, at: 2006/07/09 04:04
KD9JUR
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- steell
- Offline
- User
I think you probably mean "Bridgestone"I noticed the other day that those BF Goodridge Battlaxs are going on sale.. those a real nice with the dule rubber compound. nce and sticky in the corners, but have a good compound for the up right day to day ride/tour.. might wanna check on a set.
KD9JUR
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- savedrider
- Offline
- User
- 1975 Z1-B 900
- Posts: 476
- Thank you received: 1
Get right or get left! <*{{{><
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- gpzrox
- Offline
- User
- Posts: 201
- Thank you received: 0
I'm running Pirelli Demons, no problems here so far, but these are the first set I have run on my setup, so have nothing to compare them too. For $75/tire new and Pirellis background, I didn't feel that I could beat it.
Years ago, I ran the Bridgestones, they were OK. Metzlers were top shelf, and Dunlop made a fine tire. Chen Shing or whatever seems to have worked their way up the ranks, kind of like Hyundai -- they were real cheap way back, but seems to have evolved into a very good tire. Have seen good writeups on here. I believe it is the Baraccuda that is liked.
Can't help you on the size, though. Just make sure you go bias ply, not radials, not right now. Your bike was made for bias plys.
When did the bikes go to not needing a tube, or am I completely blown away by the fact that my 84 GPZ could need tubes, but I don't run them?
84 GPZ750. Modded with stock Kawasaki parts: ZR-7 shock, ZX-6 coils, GPZ1100 throttle, EN454 brake, GPZ900 fuse box, etc. and non stock: Ken Sears mirrors, K&N filter, Pirelli Sport Demons.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- jbw7300
- Offline
- User
- you can't ride if your fried
84 kz 700 a1 sports
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- steell
- Offline
- User
83-85 GPz750 has tubeless mags (it's marked on the rim) and I use a pic of a GPz750 rim in the pics I have posted showing the difference between the tube and tubeless type mag wheels, I use a 79 KZ650SR wheel as a tube type example.
The 78-79 (don't know about other years) has a 2.15x19 front wheel, and a 3.00x16 rear wheel, and my nephew's 79 KZ650SR has 110/90/19 front, 130/90/16 rear tires.
I just checked buykawasaki.com, and it says 3.50x19 which converts to 100/90/19 for the front, and 5.10x16 which converts to 130/80/16 or 130/90/16 for the rear.
According to this Conversion chart
Post edited by: steell, at: 2006/07/09 12:54
KD9JUR
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Leather
- Offline
- User
- Posts: 76
- Thank you received: 1
or maybe it was bike bandit's come to think on it a sec. I my self went up to a 130 tread width with the higher profil 90 side wall.. and as I dont plane to run extended speeds over 100 mph I opted for the 4 ply rate. for a bit more carcass under me.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.