KZR's Bikes of the Month for 2024

'76 KZ900 (ZRX1200R) Build

  • mark1122
  • Offline
  • User
  • Keep twisting it
More
01 Aug 2012 17:34 #540047 by mark1122
Replied by mark1122 on topic '76 KZ900 (ZRX1200R) Build
u could just try it and see how it works, thats what i did. but in the end it made more sense to copy what ma kawi's engineers had already figured out.

with a non stock setup, it will be impossible to get accurate spring weight info.
i have installed raceteck fork shims and springs, but all of there data is based on the stock geometry of each bike.
u will need to get an opinion from a good tech.

76 KZ, frame gusset work,1200CC.Ported by Larry Cavanaugh, 1.5mm.over intakes, Carron Pipe, ZRX12 rear end, and seat,96zx9 front end.
01 CBR600F4i Track bike.
Cobourg, Ont. Can.

~ ~ ~_@
~ ~ _- \,
~ (k) / (z)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
01 Aug 2012 17:46 #540051 by NakedFun
Replied by NakedFun on topic '76 KZ900 (ZRX1200R) Build

mark1122 wrote: u could just try it and see how it works, thats what i did. but in the end it made more sense to copy what ma kawi's engineers had already figured out.

with a non stock setup, it will be impossible to get accurate spring weight info.
i have installed raceteck fork shims and springs, but all of there data is based on the stock geometry of each bike.
u will need to get an opinion from a good tech.


True, but if you talk with the ZRXOA (I see you're a member there too) they think the stock ZRX suspension/geometry is not sprung for the majority of the riders.....evidently the US public is really fat compared to Japan! lol I am thinking more and more of taking my new upper mounts to the mill, radius them and and weld them into the frame tubes about 2 inches or so down from the junction with the seat rails. I think it is close to where you ended up. Will take the measurements tonight and compare to my ZRX.

Cory

2008 Kawasaki Concours 14
1999 Kawasaki ZRX1100
1976 Kawasaki KZ900

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • mark1122
  • Offline
  • User
  • Keep twisting it
More
01 Aug 2012 17:57 - 01 Aug 2012 22:03 #540056 by mark1122
Replied by mark1122 on topic '76 KZ900 (ZRX1200R) Build
i agree, that goes for most bikes.
i just feel that my rear end (the bikes, lol)feels better/smoother, tracks the road better in the lowered position. it also makes the internal damping work as intended. its more about letting the shock work the modern way as apposed to the old way. when they designed the kz that era ran the shocks more upright. a vertical shock over the axle travels at the same rate as the wheel. 1:1. through there racing efforts they discovered that the bikes handled better when they started giving the shock less travel to the axles. Just look at the race bikes in the late 70’s to early 80’s, they started laying the shock down. this improved the handling. eventually they hit the limit, and went mono with levers to get the ratios way up. and the handling went up with it.

it made a big dif. that I could feel. to me anyways
hard to go wrong if u copy ma kawi. :)

76 KZ, frame gusset work,1200CC.Ported by Larry Cavanaugh, 1.5mm.over intakes, Carron Pipe, ZRX12 rear end, and seat,96zx9 front end.
01 CBR600F4i Track bike.
Cobourg, Ont. Can.

~ ~ ~_@
~ ~ _- \,
~ (k) / (z)
Last edit: 01 Aug 2012 22:03 by mark1122.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
01 Aug 2012 21:38 #540100 by 750steve
Replied by 750steve on topic '76 KZ900 (ZRX1200R) Build

07 ZX6R Race Bike
1977 Z750 B2 Twin
1976 Z650 B1

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
01 Aug 2012 23:16 #540116 by NakedFun
Replied by NakedFun on topic '76 KZ900 (ZRX1200R) Build

bluezbike wrote: Hi Cory,

My question about the length of the forks is because I will be building a bike up this winter and I am gathering as much information as I can before I start as I have never done this before.
I followed a discussion earlier in another thread about how important it was to know exactly what one is doing when changing out front ends which in turn can alter the way bike handles, sometimes very badly, not a situation I want to find myself in. Length of forks was a biggie as well as offsets, trail etc. Many thanks for all the replies.

Alec aka Bluezbike


Alec,

30.25" from axle center to flat surface on fork cap.

Cory

2008 Kawasaki Concours 14
1999 Kawasaki ZRX1100
1976 Kawasaki KZ900

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
01 Aug 2012 23:29 #540120 by NakedFun
Replied by NakedFun on topic '76 KZ900 (ZRX1200R) Build
OK, so looking at chain measurement. With my 3/8" offset front, I would need to mill the hub 12mm. Now, I have almost 19mm between the backside surface of the rear sprocket, and the outer most seam/sidewall/molding line of the tire. So, I measured a couple of "O" ring chains and they are about 6.3mm thick from the top of the rivet to the inside of the inner link (read: side of sprocket). This means the side of the chain will move 18.3-19mm. This will probable touch the tire.... So question, is it OK to add a shim behind the front sprocket, so I can reduce the hub milling depth so I can keep some clearance between it and the tire? Thinking about calling the sprocket manufacturer and see if they will make me a custom offset. Thoughts?

Cory

2008 Kawasaki Concours 14
1999 Kawasaki ZRX1100
1976 Kawasaki KZ900

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • mark1122
  • Offline
  • User
  • Keep twisting it
More
02 Aug 2012 00:45 - 02 Aug 2012 00:49 #540146 by mark1122
Replied by mark1122 on topic '76 KZ900 (ZRX1200R) Build
r u sure thats right? 19mm (3/4")seems like a lot of space.
what if u were to run a 1/2" or 5/8" off set countersprocket. would that help fix it at the back?
Leon , D&G or PMF can make any offset u need.

76 KZ, frame gusset work,1200CC.Ported by Larry Cavanaugh, 1.5mm.over intakes, Carron Pipe, ZRX12 rear end, and seat,96zx9 front end.
01 CBR600F4i Track bike.
Cobourg, Ont. Can.

~ ~ ~_@
~ ~ _- \,
~ (k) / (z)
Last edit: 02 Aug 2012 00:49 by mark1122.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
02 Aug 2012 03:22 #540182 by mtbspeedfreak
Replied by mtbspeedfreak on topic '76 KZ900 (ZRX1200R) Build

750steve wrote: Need some idea's?

racingcafe.blogspot.co.uk/2012/07/kawasa...900-style-by-rf.html


Oh wow... I thought that was a Z1 at first!!! Mad kudos to whoever made that!

I'm curious to see how you like the front end and how much lower the bike is. I'm strongly considering rebuilding my stock front end with RaceTech goodies, but I'd love to swap it out for a ZRX front end.

2000 ZRX 1100
1976 KZ 900- Daily Driver
1980 LTD 550- Dalton Highway survivor!

If it has tits or tires, it'll give you problems!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
02 Aug 2012 07:46 #540205 by camaroguy
Replied by camaroguy on topic '76 KZ900 (ZRX1200R) Build
got my offset sprocket form d&g. they can make you just about anything you need

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
02 Aug 2012 10:25 #540225 by NakedFun
Replied by NakedFun on topic '76 KZ900 (ZRX1200R) Build
Ok, so I did some more research.....

I have been reading technical articles from sprocket/chain manufacters that discuss chain alignment. Naturally, if a chain is out of alignment, that is not good. You get accelerated wear, uneven wear, possible chain derailment, etc... Now they did a study and found that at 3 degrees defelection robbed approx. 4.25 HP when measured on a dyno. So I took some measurements of the current setup as it is, without an correction for alignment besides the front offset sprocket.

The plane to plane difference is 12mm (.47") in order to put it into perfect alingment. Now like I stated above, it appears with the "o" ring chain stacked plate thickness, I will be at an additional 8 mm toward the tire. Currently I have about 19 mm of clearance, so I have a conflict of 2 mm (1mm for the difference, and another for min clearance). So with a cetner to center distance of 27.25" and a displacement of .47" it looks like I am just shy of 1 degree (.99) of deflection. Is there an acceptable angle of deflection? Less than 0.5 degrees? Just thinking if I mill the hub as far as I can without running the chain into the tire and letting the rest of it be? What about adding the difference into the shim and placing it behind the front sprocket? Thoughts?

Cory

2008 Kawasaki Concours 14
1999 Kawasaki ZRX1100
1976 Kawasaki KZ900

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
02 Aug 2012 10:30 #540226 by NakedFun
Replied by NakedFun on topic '76 KZ900 (ZRX1200R) Build
Mark,

I know I can get 5/8" pretty easily and was thinking of ordering one through PBSprockets where I got this one. Very nice part and inexpensive. My fear is two fold:

1. Frame clearance: It seems like everyone who runs the 5/8" offset has to clearance the frame.
2. Outer Bearing Support Required: I really don't want to have to run an outer bearing support.

If I have leon make me a 1/2" offset which would atleast get me out of the tire rub issue, I would still have to check on the frame clearance though. Would I need an outer bearing support for that as well? Thoughts comments concerns?

Cory

2008 Kawasaki Concours 14
1999 Kawasaki ZRX1100
1976 Kawasaki KZ900

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
02 Aug 2012 10:37 #540229 by NakedFun
Replied by NakedFun on topic '76 KZ900 (ZRX1200R) Build
Also took some pics outside so I can get an idea of the current stance.





In addition, need to decide on two different sets of front calipers.

6 pots:


4 pots:


Comments? Thoughts?

Cory

2008 Kawasaki Concours 14
1999 Kawasaki ZRX1100
1976 Kawasaki KZ900

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Powered by Kunena Forum

If you like KZR Please consider making a donation. Thank you.

KZRider is free, but not without cost.

Please consider chipping in a few bucks to help cover the cost of running the KZR servers.